An interactive economic model of an availability-based prison PPP — watch cells earn the unitary charge while unavailable cells trigger deductions, see the availability vs services split, and run the investment case live.
A prison PPP is the opposite of a toll asset: there is no demand risk — the state pays a contracted, inflation-linked unitary charge for every place, whether or not the cell is full. The catch is performance: when a cell is unavailable or a service standard is missed, the contract docks the payment with weighted deductions. Because the operator's cost base — custodial staffing, FM — is sticky, those deductions fall almost entirely through to EBITDA. The case turns on the size of the estate, the unitary charge, and how reliably it is delivered.
Year-1 financials flow live from the simulation above: revenue £0 and EBITDA £0 p.a. Set your deal terms below — the unlevered IRR (asset return) and levered IRR (return to equity, after debt) recompute instantly.
Illustrative model. Represents an availability-based prison PPP/PFI concession. Gross revenue = places × unitary charge, split into an availability (accommodation) payment and a custodial-services payment; net revenue deducts weighted availability/performance deductions of roughly 1.4× the pro-rata value of unavailable capacity. Operating costs (custodial staffing, facilities management, healthcare & programmes, insurance, lifecycle & SPV costs) are dominated by per-place staffing and are largely fixed against availability — so deductions fall almost entirely through to EBITDA. EBITDA = net revenue − operating costs; excludes upfront construction capex and senior debt service. The investment case is a simplified DCF. For illustration only — not investment advice, and not any specific asset.