A rail-infrastructure concession owns the track, signalling and stations, and charges train operators a track-access charge for every train path they run. The cost base — renewals, signalling, station upkeep — is overwhelmingly fixed, so an empty railway is ruinous while a busy one is hugely profitable. The investment case turns on how intensively the line is used (train paths per day), the access charge, and the station/property income that footfall generates.
Year-1 financials flow live from the simulation above: revenue £0 and EBITDA £0 p.a. Set your deal terms below — the unlevered IRR (asset return) and levered IRR (return to equity, after debt) recompute instantly.
Illustrative model. Represents a passenger rail-infrastructure concession (track, signalling and stations). Revenue = train paths × access charge, plus station retail and property income that scales with passenger footfall. Operating costs (track & structures renewals, signalling & control, station and energy O&M, per-path operations, insurance and a revenue-linked network fee) are dominated by fixed renewals, with only the per-path cost and the network fee scaling with volume — so utilisation drives the result and a lightly used line loses money. EBITDA = revenue − operating costs; excludes upfront construction/acquisition capex. The investment case is a simplified DCF. For illustration only — not investment advice, and not any specific asset.